蔡细历事件-默许或指示?

<星洲日报缘何放大蔡细历被偷拍广告?>这是笔者原先想设立的主题,为了公平起见;花时间浏览其他"主流"媒体才惊觉基本亲官方的华巫英媒体都步伐一致的采用放大视觉来处理这"私人"新闻.

到底是默许还是指示?和藏镜人有无关系,我们都会想最重要的和来届大选的战略有无直接关系?

如果媒体对待蔡前部长的事件的标准可以放在国家政治人物贪污舞弊,工程丑闻,政治恐吓等等有益全民的"知的权利",那对马来西亚人民应该是2008年最大的祝福了!

translation base google:
This is the original author would like to set up the theme, for the sake of fairness; spend time browsing other "mainstream" media only surprise the basic pro-government media, (Chinese,Malay ,English) consistent pace the use of visual magnification to handle this "private" information. In the end is acquiescence or instructions? And possession mirror to whether people, we will think the most important and strategic to the session whether direct elections?
If the media treatment of former Minister Choi events standards on the country's political figures of corruption, the scandals, political intimidation, etc. useful for all "the rights to know" that the people of Malaysia in 2008 should be the greatest blessing!